ISO 27001 gap analysis
ISO 27001 gap analysis, run on your own evidence
Upload the policies, procedures and registers you already have. Celeredge scores them against the Annex A control set, shows you which controls have nothing behind them, and cites the source document for every finding it makes.
From $59 per seat / month, after a 7-day free trial. A readiness and gap review, not a certification audit.
The problem
Where ISO 27001 readiness stalls
The quote is the blocker
A scoped ISO 27001 gap analysis from a consultancy runs to five figures and several weeks before it tells you much you didn't already suspect.
A spreadsheet against 93 controls
Doing it in-house means one person reading policy documents against Annex A, with scoring that drifts and no trail back to what they actually read.
Findings you can't defend
A gap you can't tie to a source document is a gap your board, your auditor or your next enterprise prospect will push back on.
How Celeredge helps
Every finding cites the document it came from
Celeredge reads what you already hold, including policies, procedures, risk registers and previous audit reports, and scores it against the Annex A control set. Where the evidence isn't there, it records the gap instead of inventing a control.
- Scored across all 93 Annex A controls, banded by maturity, gaps ranked by severity
- Every score links to the source document behind it, open the evidence appendix and check any of them
- An AI interviewer asks targeted follow-ups where the documents fall short
- Gap report and board-ready deck generated from the same evidence
Explore more
Related to ISO 27001 readiness
Questions
ISO 27001 gap analysis FAQ
Is this a certification audit?
No. Celeredge runs an independent readiness and gap review. It tells you what an accredited auditor is likely to ask for and where your evidence doesn't yet answer it. Certification itself still requires an accredited certification body.
How is this different from Vanta or Drata?
Those tools monitor controls once you already know what your controls are. Celeredge does the step before that: assessing your current state against the standard from the documents you have today, then producing the gap analysis and the remediation plan. Plenty of teams run both.
Can the findings be trusted?
Every score and finding links to the evidence behind it, down to the source document. Where your evidence contains nothing relevant to a control, the platform records a gap rather than generating a plausible-sounding answer. You can open the evidence appendix and check any finding yourself.
What happens to our documents?
Your evidence stays yours. It is encrypted in transit, tenant isolation is enforced server-side rather than filtered in the query, and we never train models on your content.
Which other frameworks can we run?
More than 80, across nine practices. The ones most often run alongside ISO 27001 are SOC 2, NIST CSF 2.0, Cyber Essentials, ISO 27701 and ISO 42001.
Run it on your own documents.
Start with the evidence you already have and see where the gaps are before you commit to a consultant or a certification body.