SOC 2 readiness assessment
SOC 2 readiness, assessed from your own evidence
Find out what your auditor will ask for before you engage one. Celeredge scores the policies and evidence you already hold against the Trust Services Criteria, and cites the source document behind every finding.
From $59 per seat / month, after a 7-day free trial. A readiness and gap review, not a SOC 2 audit.
The problem
Where SOC 2 readiness stalls
Scope decided by guesswork
Security is the only criterion every report must cover. Choosing whether Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity or Privacy belong in scope changes the cost of the whole engagement.
Readiness priced like the audit
A readiness review from a consultancy often costs as much as the audit that follows it, and arrives weeks later.
Evidence scattered across tools
Policies in one place, tickets in another, access reviews in a third, and nothing that maps them to a criterion.
How Celeredge helps
Scored against the criteria you actually scope
Celeredge reads the policies, procedures and reports you already hold, maps them to the Trust Services Criteria in scope, and shows which ones have no evidence behind them at all.
- Scoped to the criteria you select, with Security always covered
- Every finding cites the source document behind it
- Gaps ranked by severity, so remediation has an order
- Gap report and board-ready deck generated from the same evidence
Explore more
Related to SOC 2 readiness
Questions
SOC 2 readiness assessment FAQ
Is this a SOC 2 audit?
No. A SOC 2 report can only be issued by a licensed CPA firm. Celeredge runs the readiness work that comes first: what an auditor will ask for, and where your evidence does not yet answer it.
Does it cover Type I and Type II?
Readiness for both starts in the same place: whether the control exists and whether you can evidence it. Type II additionally tests that the control operated over a period, so Celeredge flags where you hold a policy but no operating evidence across time.
How is this different from Vanta or Drata?
Those tools monitor controls continuously once your control set is defined. Celeredge does the step before that, assessing what you have today against the criteria and producing the gap analysis. Plenty of teams run both.
Can the findings be trusted?
Every finding links to the evidence behind it. Where your evidence contains nothing relevant to a criterion, the platform records a gap rather than generating a plausible-sounding answer.
Run it on your own documents.
See where the gaps are before you pay for audit time.